Tuesday, June 4, 2024

XEN-45 GEL IMPLANT: 2-YEAR OUTCOMES

 


A retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness observational registry was used to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety outcomes of the Xen-45 gel stent implant over 24 months of follow-up.

SEE OTHER RELATED POSTShttps://ourgsc.blogspot.com/search?q=xen

Xen 45 was implanted in 646 eyes of 515 patients. [Xen stand-alone (n=199) and Xen+cataract (n=139)]

The most common diagnosis was primary open-angle glaucoma accounting for 69% of cases. Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 21.4±7.6mm Hg, the mean number of medications was 2.7±1.3 and the average visual field mean deviation where that was recorded, was −10.2±8.4dB.

Sub-group analysis included Xen implant alone versus Xen+Cataract surgery.

Complete success (CS) was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction ≥20% from preoperative and an IOP ≤18mm Hg and ≥6mm Hg with no secondary procedure at 2 years and without IOP-lowering medications.

Qualified success (QS) was defined similarly, allowing the use of IOP-lowering medications.

Preoperative IOP was 21.4±7.6 (mean±SD) mm Hg on 2.7±1.3 IOP-lowering medication and the mean deviation was −10.2±8.4 dB.

After 24-month follow-up, IOP was 16.8±7.3mm Hg (mean reduction of 21.7%) on 1.2±1.4 IOP-lowering medications, a mean reduction of 1.6 medications. The proportion of eyes which were completely off all glaucoma medications was 51%.

CS and QS rates at 24 months were 26% and 48%, respectively. CS and QS were higher in the Xen stand-alone group (33% and 52%, respectively) than in the Xen+cataract group (16% and 42%, respectively).

Success rates of 27% and 34% after Xen gel implant have been reported in other studies.

Bleb needling was performed in 28.4% of cases. Some other studies have reported rates of bleb needling following Xen implantation ranging from 41% to 62%.

18% of patients underwent a secondary glaucoma procedure, most commonly being bleb revision (7.5%). This included either bleb revision alone or revision combined with cataract surgery. In addition, 5.1% of eyes underwent trabeculectomy following Xen implantation within the first 24 months.

The most common adverse event was a loss of ≥10 letters of VA from baseline. This occurred in 31% of eyes within the first 6 months after surgery. This was attributed to ocular hypotony. Device exposure occurred in 1.8% eyes.

CONCLUSION:

The Xen 45 gel stent implant offers acceptable long-term efficacy for treating open-angle glaucoma. However, there is a significant rate of reoperation and needling, and outcomes are less effective if combined with cataract surgery.

REFERENCE:

Arnould L, Balsat E, Hashimoto Y, et al. Br J Ophthalmol Epub ahead of print: [please include Day Month Year]. doi:10.1136/ bjo-2023-325077.



No comments:

Post a Comment

Ahmed Glaucoma Valve for NVG in PDR vs. CRVO

Is there any difference in the outcomes after Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation in patients who develop neovascular glaucoma (NGV) fol...